Best Greenhouse Alternatives in 2027: Compared & Ranked
Greenhouse is still the applicant tracking system most mid-sized US talent teams measure everything else against. Its structured hiring, scorecards and integration marketplace are genuinely strong. But Greenhouse doesn’t publish prices, its deeper sourcing and CRM features sit in the higher Plus and Pro tiers, and smaller teams often find they are paying for an enterprise process they don’t actually run. If a renewal is coming up, or you are weighing Greenhouse for the first time, these are the alternatives worth a demo.
Quick answer: Ashby is the best Greenhouse alternative for most growing companies: ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics in one system, with published starter pricing. Workable is the pick for small and mid-sized teams that want transparent pricing and a free trial. Lever is the closest like-for-like switch if you want ATS and CRM on one candidate record. Teamtailor and Pinpoint suit employer-brand-led teams, SmartRecruiters suits enterprise and high-volume hiring, and Zoho Recruit is the budget option. If sourcing is your real gap, Gem can sit on top of Greenhouse instead of replacing it.
Last updated November 2026. Prices checked on November 10, 2026; vendors change pricing often, so confirm before you buy.
Some links in this guide are partner links. If you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It does not affect our rankings.
Quick comparison
|
Platform |
Best for |
Starting price |
Free trial/plan |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ashby |
All-in-one ATS, CRM and analytics |
$400/mo (11–25 staff) |
Demo only |
|
Workable |
SMBs wanting clear pricing |
$299/mo (annual) |
15-day trial |
|
Lever |
ATS and CRM on one record |
Quote on request |
Demo only |
|
Gem |
Sourcing-led teams |
$130/mo (startups, annual) |
6 months free under 30 staff |
|
Teamtailor |
Employer brand and career sites |
Quote on request |
Demo only |
|
Pinpoint |
In-house teams, approval workflows |
Quote on request |
Demo only |
|
SmartRecruiters |
Enterprise and high-volume hiring |
Quote on request |
Demo only |
|
Zoho Recruit |
Tight budgets |
Free plan; paid per recruiter |
Free plan + 15-day trial |
Why teams look for a Greenhouse alternative
We compared the main alternatives against the reasons talent leaders give for leaving or skipping Greenhouse. Four come up again and again:
- No list price. Greenhouse sells its Core, Plus and Pro plans on custom quotes only, so you can’t budget or compare without a sales cycle.
- Feature gating. Fuller CRM, sourcing and reporting capabilities sit in the upper tiers, which pushes growing teams into a bigger contract.
- Admin weight. Structured hiring works best when someone owns the configuration. Teams without a recruiting ops person can end up using a fraction of what they pay for.
- Tool sprawl. Many Greenhouse customers bolt on separate tools for sourcing, scheduling or analytics. All-in-one platforms now cover much of that in a single bill.
If you are still deciding between the big names, our Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable vs Bullhorn comparison goes deeper on those four, and our full ranking of applicant tracking systems covers the wider market.
The best Greenhouse alternatives in 2027
1. Ashby: best all-in-one alternative
Ashby combines an ATS, a recruiting CRM, interview scheduling and analytics in one product. It started with startups and now sells three tiers: Foundations for companies up to 100 employees, Plus for roughly 101 to 1,000, and Enterprise above that. Its reporting is the main reason talent teams switch, and Ashby also sells its analytics separately to companies that keep another ATS.
Best for: growing companies that want one system instead of an ATS plus three add-on tools, and talent leaders who live in their recruiting data.
Key features:
- Multi-channel outreach sequences, a sourcing Chrome extension and 200 email lookups a month on every plan
- AI-assisted application review and fraudulent candidate detection
- Direct-booking interview scheduling, structured interview plans and debriefs
- Offers with built-in e-signature and approval workflows
- Ready-made dashboards on all plans, with custom dashboards and alerts from Plus
- 250+ integrations, an open API and an MCP server for AI tools
Pricing: Foundations is $400 a month for companies with 11 to 25 employees on monthly billing, with 10% off for an annual commitment; the price changes with headcount. Plus and Enterprise are quote-based. SSO costs $100 a month on Foundations, and the AI Notetaker and Advanced Scheduling are paid add-ons.
Limitations: Ashby doesn’t advertise a free trial. Custom dashboards, scheduled reports and calculated fields only arrive on Plus, so smaller teams get the standard reporting. There is a lot to configure, and you’ll get the most from it if someone owns the setup.
Skip it if: you hire a handful of people a year and just need job posting and a pipeline. A simpler, cheaper ATS will do.
2. Workable: best for small and mid-sized teams
Workable is the most transparent major ATS on pricing. It posts to 200+ job boards, includes a sourcing database, and can be bundled with Workable’s HR module (employee records, onboarding, time off) for one combined bill. It now ships an AI recruiting agent that sources, screens and engages candidates on a per-action credit basis.
Best for: small and mid-sized companies without a dedicated recruiting ops team that want to be live within days and see the price upfront.
Key features:
- One-click posting to 200+ job boards and a careers page builder
- Passive candidate sourcing across 400M+ profiles
- Interview kits, scorecards, self-scheduled interviews and two-way calendar sync
- Built-in talent CRM, custom report builder and EEO/OFCCP compliance tools
- Workable Agent for AI sourcing, screening and engagement, with 3,000 free AI credits
Pricing: for 1 to 20 employees on annual billing, Standard is $299 a month, Premier $599 and Enterprise $719. Prices rise with your employee count. On Standard, texting ($89/mo), video interviews ($109/mo) and assessments ($59/mo) are add-ons; Premier includes them. Extra AI credits start at $600 for 5,000. There’s a 15-day free trial with no credit card.
Limitations: pricing follows company headcount, not recruiter seats, so a large company hiring lightly pays more than you might expect. Add-ons quickly lift the Standard price. The free trial doesn’t include Workable Agent.
Skip it if: you need deep custom analytics or very complex, multi-stage approval chains across many business units.
3. Lever: closest like-for-like switch
Lever is the alternative most Greenhouse buyers shortlist first. It puts the ATS and a recruiting CRM on a single candidate record, which suits teams that nurture passive candidates over months. Lever is now part of Employ Inc., which also owns JazzHR and Jobvite, and in 2026 it repackaged its offer as a single AI-powered hiring platform with optional add-ons.
Best for: mid-sized and enterprise in-house teams that want Greenhouse-level depth with CRM built in rather than tiered.
Key features:
- ATS and CRM in one platform, with nurture campaigns for passive candidates
- Out-of-the-box dashboards and customizable reports
- AI-powered screening and matching, plus AI fraud-prevention signals
- Unlimited AI interview transcripts and summaries
- Optional add-ons for Candidate Insights, AI Screening by VONQ and onboarding
Pricing: Quote on request. Lever publishes no prices and scales its quotes by company size and hiring needs.
Limitations: like Greenhouse, you can’t compare prices without a sales call, and there’s no advertised free trial. Since the Employ consolidation, ask how support and the product roadmap are handled for your account size.
Skip it if: opaque pricing is the reason you’re leaving Greenhouse. You’ll meet the same buying process here. If you’re on Lever already, our Lever alternatives guide covers where to go next.
4. Gem: best for sourcing-led teams
Gem made its name as the sourcing and CRM layer many Greenhouse customers add on top. It now sells two packages: Gem + Your ATS, which keeps Greenhouse as your system of record, and Gem All-in-One, which includes its own ATS. That makes Gem unusual on this list: it can replace Greenhouse, or fix what you’re missing without a migration.
Best for: teams whose hiring depends on outbound sourcing, and Greenhouse customers who mainly need better sourcing, scheduling or analytics.
Key features:
- AI sourcing across 800M+ profiles and AI ranking of your existing candidate database
- Unlimited email-finding and multi-channel outreach sequences
- AI application review, talent rediscovery and fraud detection agents
- Candidate self-scheduling and panel interview scheduling
- Talent Compass analytics with forecasting and industry benchmarks
Pricing: both packages are priced on your company’s FTE count by quote. Startups get published rates: for 1 to 10 FTE the full platform is $130 a month billed yearly. Companies under 30 employees get Gem All-in-One free for six months, then 50% off.
Limitations: the AI agents require AI-powered seats rather than standard seats. Gem’s ATS is newer than its CRM, so check scorecards, approvals and reporting carefully in the demo if you plan to replace Greenhouse outright.
Skip it if: most of your hires come from inbound applications and sourcing isn’t a priority.
5. Teamtailor: best for employer brand and career sites
Teamtailor is a Swedish ATS built around the candidate-facing side of hiring: branded career sites, content and talent pools. More than 13,000 companies use it, and every plan includes unlimited users and unlimited job postings, which suits companies where many hiring managers need access.
Best for: companies whose employer brand does a lot of the recruiting work, and teams hiring across the US, UK and EU that want strong GDPR controls.
Key features:
- Career site builder and employer branding tools
- Teamtailor AI included with unlimited usage
- Talent pools and candidate CRM, internal mobility and referrals
- Structured interviews, smart scheduling, surveys and candidate NPS
- 450+ integrations, an open API, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certification
Pricing: Quote on request. Teamtailor asks for company details and sends an estimate.
Limitations: requisitions and approval flows, and multi-brand management, are Premium features. US-only teams should check EEO and OFCCP reporting in the demo, since much of Teamtailor’s customer base is European.
Skip it if: your bottleneck is outbound sourcing rather than inbound candidate attraction.
6. Pinpoint: best for in-house teams with hiring-manager workflows
Pinpoint is an ATS built for in-house recruiting teams rather than agencies. It covers branded careers sites, job requisition and approval workflows, collaborative hiring and employee referrals. Pinpoint prices on hiring complexity as well as company size, which can help organizations that hire heavily relative to their headcount.
Best for: mid-sized in-house teams that want a polished candidate experience and a clear process for hiring managers.
Key features:
- Branded careers site and job distribution
- Requisition requests and approval workflows
- Hiring-manager collaboration, interview scheduling and scorecards
- Employee referrals and reporting
Pricing: Quote on request, after a short call with Pinpoint’s team.
Limitations: there’s no public price list or self-serve trial, so you can’t shortlist on cost alone. Compare its sourcing tools carefully if outbound matters to you.
Skip it if: you want to sign up and start posting jobs today without a sales conversation.
7. SmartRecruiters: best for enterprise and high-volume hiring
SmartRecruiters is an enterprise talent acquisition suite used by more than 4,000 organizations. SAP completed its acquisition in September 2025, and SmartRecruiters is sold both as a standalone platform and inside SAP SuccessFactors. Its Winston AI handles matching, screening support and conversational candidate chat.
Best for: large employers running both professional and high-volume hiring, especially those already on SAP.
Key features:
- ATS and CRM with job distribution and an advanced agency portal
- Winston Match AI talent matching and an AI hiring companion
- Candidate messaging by SMS, WhatsApp and web
- Dynamic interview scheduling and a SmartSandbox test environment
- Winston Chat add-on for conversational job discovery and applications
Pricing: Quote on request.
Limitations: it’s built for enterprise complexity, so smaller teams will find it heavy. Ask how the SAP integration roadmap and licensing will affect you as a standalone customer.
Skip it if: you have fewer than a few hundred employees and no plans to run SAP.
8. Zoho Recruit: best budget alternative
Zoho Recruit has a Corporate HR edition for in-house teams alongside its staffing-agency edition. It’s priced per recruiter, includes a forever-free plan, and fits naturally if you already use Zoho People or other Zoho apps.
Best for: small companies and cost-conscious HR teams that need a real ATS without a Greenhouse-sized contract.
Key features:
- Branded careers site, premium job boards and employee referrals
- Resume parsing, Boolean search and assessments
- AI candidate matching, Blueprint process automation and custom reports on Enterprise
- Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, SMS and WhatsApp integrations on Enterprise
Pricing: the Forever Free plan covers one active job. Standard and Enterprise are priced per recruiter per month, with up to 16% off for yearly billing, and Zoho shows the exact rate in your currency on its pricing page. There’s a 15-day free trial of the Enterprise features and a 45-day money-back guarantee on paid plans.
Limitations: each recruiter licence carries an active job cap (10 on Standard, 20 on Enterprise), and extra openings cost more. Reviewers often find the interface busier than newer tools, and the best integrations are with other Zoho products.
Skip it if: you run many open roles per recruiter or want a modern, AI-first workflow out of the box.
When to stay on Greenhouse
Switching ATS is disruptive, and Greenhouse is still the right choice for plenty of teams. Stay if your structured hiring process works, your hiring managers actually use the scorecards, and you rely on integrations from its marketplace. In that case, use a competing quote from Ashby or Lever to negotiate your Greenhouse renewal, and fill specific gaps with add-ons: Gem for sourcing, or Ashby Analytics for reporting on top of your existing ATS.
How to choose a Greenhouse alternative
- Price on next year’s headcount. Workable, Ashby and Gem all price by company size, so model the cost at the headcount you expect in 12 months, not today’s.
- Check what the base plan includes. Texting, video interviews, SSO, advanced scheduling and AI credits are add-ons on several platforms.
- Plan the migration. Ask each vendor exactly what moves across from Greenhouse: candidate profiles, attachments, scorecards, notes and email history.
- Test it with hiring managers. They decide whether feedback gets submitted on time. Put two or three in the demo.
- Review compliance. Check EEO and OFCCP reporting for US hiring, GDPR controls for UK and EU candidates, and how any AI screening fits laws such as New York City’s Local Law 144.
Use this as a shortcut to your shortlist:
|
Your situation |
Best fit |
|---|---|
|
Under 100 employees and want one system |
Ashby Foundations or Workable |
|
Want to see a price before a sales call |
Workable or Zoho Recruit |
|
Hiring depends on outbound sourcing |
Gem or Ashby |
|
Careers site and employer brand do the heavy lifting |
Teamtailor or Pinpoint |
|
Want the closest swap with a built-in CRM |
Lever |
|
Enterprise scale or already on SAP |
SmartRecruiters |
|
Happy with Greenhouse but missing sourcing or analytics |
Keep Greenhouse; add Gem or Ashby Analytics |
Smaller teams should also read our guides to the best ATS for small business and free vs paid applicant tracking systems. If outbound sourcing is the priority, compare recruitment CRM software before you commit.
FAQ
What is the best alternative to Greenhouse?
Ashby is the best Greenhouse alternative for most growing companies, because it combines ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics in one platform with published starter pricing. Workable is the better choice for smaller teams that want a free trial and clear prices, and Lever is the closest like-for-like switch.
Is there a cheaper alternative to Greenhouse?
Yes. Workable publishes prices from $299 a month on annual billing for companies with up to 20 employees, and Zoho Recruit has a forever-free plan plus low per-recruiter paid plans. Greenhouse only sells on custom quotes, so get a quote before assuming any option is cheaper at your size.
Which Greenhouse alternatives offer a free trial?
Workable and Zoho Recruit both offer 15-day free trials, and Gem gives companies under 30 employees its All-in-One platform free for six months. Ashby, Lever, Teamtailor, Pinpoint and SmartRecruiters are demo-led.
Is Lever better than Greenhouse?
Neither is better outright: Lever suits teams that want ATS and CRM on one candidate record, while Greenhouse is stronger on structured hiring and its integration marketplace. Our Greenhouse vs Lever comparison covers the differences in detail.
How hard is it to switch from Greenhouse?
The hard part is data migration and rebuilding your interview plans, not learning the new tool. Ask vendors what they migrate for you, export your Greenhouse data before your contract ends, and schedule the cutover for a quieter hiring period.
Can I keep Greenhouse and add the features I’m missing?
Yes. Gem’s Gem + Your ATS package adds AI sourcing, outreach, scheduling and analytics on top of Greenhouse, and Ashby sells its analytics product separately for companies that keep their existing ATS.




